Idea

Trust less, prove more

Modern technology runs on trust: in software, infrastructure, suppliers, identities and data. Every new service asks to be trusted a little. Over time the total becomes very large and very hard to see.

Remove trust where you can

The strongest position is not having to trust a system at all. If a component only needs to move data, it should not be able to read it. If a supplier only needs part of a record, it should not receive the whole thing.

Make the rest visible

Some trust cannot be removed. An application that processes a payment has to read it. Where trust remains, it should be explicit, justified and measurable, so that you can explain it to a customer, an auditor or a regulator.

Questions worth asking any vendor

  • What do you need to see, and why?
  • What happens to my data if one of your components is compromised?
  • Which cryptography do you use, and who has independently reviewed it?
  • How would you change it if it stopped being safe?
Architecture over promises. Mathematics over assumption. Evidence over marketing.

We hold ourselves to the same questions.

More insights

News

Introducing Urrora

Why we are building a company around one idea: your customers should have to trust fewer systems with their data, not more.

  • Company
  • Our purpose
Explainer

Post-quantum: what actually changes for payments

The new standards are published and the migration clock is running. What changes, what doesn't, and the one design property that matters most.

  • Quantum
  • Payments
  • Crypto-agility
Point of view

Where your customers' data is exposed today

Encrypted in transit, encrypted at rest. Follow one piece of customer data through your stack and count how often it is neither.

  • Data exposure
  • Architecture

Contact

Get in touch.

Whether you’re exploring how to protect your clients’ data, interested in CCL, or want to work with us, we’d like to hear from you.

Email usinfo@urrora.com